cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
Blog Article
Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights while respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided with the decision on the Supreme Court while in the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking while in the present case. In these kinds of circumstances, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable which is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the summary or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may well interfere with the summary or even the finding and mildew the relief to really make it ideal towards the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or even the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified because of the decision with the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Ordinarily, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (including These in crystal clear violation of established case legislation) to your higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, as well as the case is just not appealed, the decision will stand.
The stated recovery could be used, within the most, for corroboration in the main evidence, but by itself it cannot be a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of incidence. The mentioned memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as very little was discovered on account of these types of pointation. The place of occurrence along with the place of throwing the dead body were already while in the knowledge of witnesses previous to their pointation via the petitioners. Reliance is usually placed on case law titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it has been held from the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:
Article 27 in the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination with the time of appointment of service but after the appointment in addition. The disparity within the pay out scale allowances of Stenographers during the District Judiciary is inside the apparent negation of the legislation laid down through the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. Read more
The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge to your Judgment within time. Read more
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, such as eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, here confirming the copyright nature in the seized currency.
VI) The petitioner is powering the bars since arrest, investigation with the case is complete, he is no more essential for your purpose of investigation and at this stage to keep him driving the bars before conclusion of trial will provide no helpful purpose.
Criminal cases While in the common regulation tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable to a case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Compared with most civil legislation systems, common regulation systems Adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their have previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lower courts should make decisions reliable with the previous decisions of higher courts.
[three] For example, in England, the High Court as well as Court of Appeals are Just about every bound by their personal previous decisions, however, Considering that the Practice Statement 1966 the Supreme Court on the United Kingdom can deviate from its earlier decisions, While in practice it seldom does. A notable example of when the court has overturned its precedent may be the case of R v Jogee, where the Supreme Court in the United Kingdom ruled that it and also the other courts of England and Wales experienced misapplied the regulation for just about thirty years.
share or interest of a co-owner in immovable property also can sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or perhaps to an stranger and section 44(Transfer of Property Act 1882)
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should also be dismissed. Suffice is to watch that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are absolutely different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case law titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held because of the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--